Inversions and Flows

I’ve mentioned in recent weeks about the “yield curve” being inverted. This happens when bond yields are backwards and short-term bonds yield more than long-term. Since this situation is a near-perfect indicator of a coming recession it’s absolutely something to pay attention to. But is the bond market actually telling us a recession is coming, or could it be pulling a head fake? What about investor sentiment? What’s that telling us?

The yield curve briefly “uninverted” last week after several weeks of inversion before inverting again. Sounds a little strange, right? Bond investors are currently betting with 100% certainty that the Federal Reserve will lower interest rates when they meet at the end of this month. Investors are also pricing in more cuts later this year. Presumably, the only reason the Fed would cut rates is if they think we’re at risk of sliding into recession, so basically that’s what the bond market is telling us. As we edge closer however, the bond market is fidgeting a bit with anticipation and so is the stock market.

Stock investors love declining interest rates because cheaper money helps juice stock prices a little longer, even if it just delays the inevitable. This thinking is what has, at least in part, been driving stock prices higher lately. But it’s interesting that even though stock market indexes like the S&P 500 have hit record highs (the S&P closed over 3,000 for the first time last week), typical “retail” investors have for many months largely been shunning stocks in favor of bonds.

Monitoring “fund flows” is important because retail investor sentiment is often seen as a contrarian indicator. They buy late, buy too much, and generally crowd in after the “smart money” has already started leaving (think lines out the door at a local brokerage office as investors waited to buy tech stocks in early 2000 just before the bubble burst). That retail investors are generally sour on stocks is telling and could mean the markets and the economy have more life in them after all, even if the Federal Reserve sees fit to lower interest rates.

The following comes from my research partners at Bespoke Investment Group and shows fund flows into and out of stock and bond mutual funds. Look at the last chart and compare the selling retail investors did in January following the lows last December. Retail investors sold almost as much as they did during the depths of the Financial Crisis. Was last December like the fall of 2008? Some investors certainly thought so. Where’s a level head when you need one?

From Bespoke

Continue reading

  • Created on .

Quarterly Update

The second quarter of 2019 (Q2) seemed full of continued trade-related market volatility and speculation about interest rates. Both categories each sent the markets down and then up again during the quarter. While May saw stocks fall 6+%, the quarter ended on a high note brought on by, you guessed it, more news about trade and interest rates.

Here’s a summary of how major market indexes ended the quarter and year-to-date, respectively (as a reminder, the YTD numbers look very strong, but this is off deep lows in December):

  • S&P 500: up 4.3%, up 18.5%
  • Russell 2000 (small company stocks): up 2.1%, up 17%
  • MSCI EAFE (foreign stocks): up 4%, up 14.5%
  • MSCI EM (emerging markets): up 0.7%, up 10.8%
  • U.S. Aggregate Bonds: up 3.1%, up 6.1%

The financial sector was the top performer during Q2, showing growth of about 8%. Technology continued its strong performance and is the best performing sector this year, up about 27% YTD. Energy stocks performed poorly, down about 3% during the quarter. Although the sector performed well during June as oil prices rose to the high-$50’s per barrel, it wasn’t enough to make up for poor performance during April and May. Gold was up as well, about 10% YTD with almost all that performance happening in June.

As has become all too familiar lately, trade rhetoric and geopolitical concerns caused a lot of market volatility during Q2, both positive and negative. April and May saw more tweets from President Trump about potential new tariffs directed at China followed by a short-term tariff-related row with Mexico. The latter ended up fizzling but was enough to add a layer of uncertainty to markets already digesting the resignation of the British PM after failing to deliver Brexit. Much of this tension eased, however, as we entered June and markets took off for the remainder of the quarter.

Continue reading...

Continue reading

  • Created on .

Insurance Cuts

Before we begin, I wanted to say a few words regarding my post from last week. I had written about the importance of charging rent to “boomerang kids” when they move back home. The idea is to welcome them as the adults they’ve become with an understanding, on both sides, of what’s expected.

This isn’t to suggest that you charge rent in all cases, however. Our kids could move back for any number of reasons and many of them, such has health-related issues, personal trauma, and so forth, would (and should) reasonably be free from rent for obvious reasons. I failed to mention this last week and wanted to clarify that here (thanks for the reminder - you know who you are).

Now on to this week’s post…

As often happens in the short-term, financial markets are all over the place. Stocks have moved up from recent lows, but the interesting activity has been mostly in the bond market. I’ve mentioned previously how the yield curve is currently inverted and how this has been a good indicator of an oncoming recession. Let’s update where we stand.

My research partners at Bespoke Investment Group put out a very good piece last week addressing how long the yield curve normally stays inverted before it starts flashing a bright red light, so to speak, for a coming recession. As shown in the graphic below, out of the seven recession periods (the gray bars) in recent decades, the yield curve has been inverted for at least 30 days, but more commonly at least 50, before being a better signal.

If you look closely, you’ll also see a lengthy inversion in 1967 that didn’t precede a recession, as well as a couple of blips as outliers in the late 90’s. While not a foregone conclusion, our current inversion is about 20 days old, so we’re knocking on the door of this becoming a more meaningful indicator.

Continue reading...

Continue reading

  • Created on .

Declaring Independence

Independence Day and the days around it have been a time of reflection for me in recent years. It was just about five years ago that I declared my own personal independence by resigning from the brokerage industry where I had worked since 2003.

As you can imagine, this was a difficult decision to make. I was the primary earner in our family and our two kids, ages 8 and 12 at the time, needed more stability than typically comes with a parent starting a new business. But it was (and is) important to me to work with clients more effectively and, following many discussions with my amazing wife, we decided it was worth the risk to go out on my own.

After feeling the swift kick from my employer when I resigned, I got to work and after a few rough months I was up and running full steam. One of the first things I did was to join a group you’ve likely heard of, the National Association of Personal Financial Advisors (NAPFA). This is an elite group and I had my sights set on membership from the very beginning.

To be a NAPFA member you must:

  • Be a Certified Financial Planner in good standing
  • Provide holistic financial planning services
  • Work in a fee-only capacity (receiving zero commissions or other monies from third parties)
  • Sign a fiduciary oath

After applying for membership and submitting a financial plan for peer review I was granted membership a few months after I started my practice. Since then I’ve been doing my continuing education (another requirement) and have generally been plugging along working with clients.

Continue reading

  • Created on .

The Secure Act

Recently the U.S. House of Representatives passed a bipartisan bill aimed at modernizing and promoting retirement savings. There hasn’t been a major update to the retirement landscape since the Pension Protection Act of 2006, so meaningful movement here is overdue. Known as the “Secure Act”, the legislation passed the House in late-May but has stalled in the Senate.

Some of the details have started to bubble up to major media outlets and several of you have asked about it, so let’s have an update, shall we?

Even in a bitterly divided Congress it’s still possible to get something done. Or at least done halfway. The Secure Act passed 417-3 in the House and was apparently getting fast-tracked through the Senate and to President Trump’s desk for signature when it was held up by two senators. The issues causing delay, apparently, have to do with expansions to how 529 plan dollars could be used by parents to fund homeschool and religious schooling. These are political hot buttons for some and worthy of holding up otherwise popular legislation. Others have wondered why political issues with education savings accounts should impede legislation aimed at retirement accounts, but that’s Washington, right? 

Here’s a review of the “major” would-be changes –

The age for starting required minimum distributions (RMD) would be moved from 70.5 to 72. This would let retirement money accumulate a little more and adjusts for longer life expectancies since the 1960’s when the current law was written. 

IRA contributions would be allowed to continue past age 70.5 for the same reason. Folks are living longer, and many are still working well past 70. It doesn’t make sense to disincentivize continued retirement savings for those not yet retired.

Continue reading...

Continue reading

  • Created on .

Catching the Boomerang

If your adult child needs to move back home for some reason, should you charge them rent? This is another recent question from a few different clients that I thought I’d address in this blog.

We all know how expensive it is to live in Sonoma County. We’ve seen home prices rise in recent years (and even more after the fires) to a current median sales price of about $611,000. The high cost makes it difficult for young first-time buyers to get a foothold in the market unless they have a higher-paying job.

But the situation is just as bad, if not worse, in the rental market. According to the website Rent Jungle, the average rent for a one-bedroom apartment in Santa Rosa is about $1,900 per month, up around 14% from last year. These housing costs contribute mightily to Santa Rosa being roughly 70% more expensive in overall cost of living than the national average.

Many of us are also painfully aware of how expensive a college degree is. The average debt load for recent grads is about $37,000 while your own child’s loans could be much higher. It can also be difficult to find a good job. The Bureau of Labor Statistics says that four-year college grads have an unemployment rate that’s almost half that of the national average, but that doesn’t necessarily mean their job pays enough.

Add all this up and it’s no surprise that many “boomerang kids” are moving back home. According to the Wall Street Journal, more than a third of young adults aged 18-34 live at home, up from about a quarter a decade or so ago.

Continue reading...

Continue reading

  • Created on .

Contact

  • Phone:
    (707) 800-6050
  • E-Mail:
    This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
  • Let's Begin:

Ridgeview Financial Planning is a California registered investment advisor. Disclaimer | Privacy Policy | ADV
Copyright © 2018 Ridgeview Financial Planning | Powered by AdvisorFlex